SyncOnAI360

Technical Debt

Find the Salesforce technical debt worth removing, and prove it is safe.

Duplicated rules, overlapping automation, unused fields and legacy Workflow and Process Builder, found from evidence, ranked, priced and turned into work you can ship safely.

Find your org's debt freeBook a demo

Org Audit

Acme Production · last run 6 minutes ago

Grade C

Priced at $150 an hour, shown on screen

  • Admin user inactive for 90+ days

    critical Minutes

    $75

  • Flow has no fault path

    high Hours

    $600

  • SOQL query inside a loop

    high Hours

    $600

  • Production change made outside the pipeline

    high Hours

    $600

  • Three record-triggered Flows on Case

    medium Days

    $2,400

5 selectedCreate statement of work

In one paragraph

SyncOnAI 360 Technical Debt finds and ranks debt in a Salesforce org from evidence: duplicate validation rules, similar fields, overlapping automation, redundant permission sets, forked Lightning components, colliding scheduled jobs, unused metadata and legacy automation. Findings carry an estimated cost to fix, become work items and ship through approval.

Detectors for duplication and overlap
6Detectors for duplication and overlap
Audit checks, including legacy automation
55Audit checks, including legacy automation
Stated rate behind each fix estimate
$150/hStated rate behind each fix estimate
Fields called unused without complete evidence
0Fields called unused without complete evidence

01The problem

Why Salesforce technical debt never gets paid down

Every admin knows the org has dead fields and tangled automation. Debt survives because nobody can say exactly where it is, what it costs, or whether removing it will break something.

  1. 01

    No inventory

    Debt is anecdotal: a list someone started in a spreadsheet, never finished, never refreshed.

  2. 02

    No price

    Without a cost, cleanup loses every prioritisation meeting to new features.

  3. 03

    Fear of deletion

    A field that looks unused might feed an integration. Without proof, nobody deletes anything.

  4. 04

    Legacy that keeps running

    Workflow Rules and Process Builder still fire alongside the Flows that were meant to replace them.

02detect

What kinds of Salesforce technical debt does SyncOnAI 360 find?

Detectors look for duplicate validation rules, similar fields, overlapping automation on the same object, redundant permission sets, forked Lightning Web Components and scheduled jobs that collide. The audit adds active Workflow Rules and Process Builder, large numbers of inactive Flows, custom fields and objects without descriptions, field sprawl and ancient Apex API versions.

Similarity is judged on text and structure, so each result explains what looks alike and why. Whether two rules should become one is a business decision, and the tool leaves it with you.

  • Duplicate rules and similar fields
  • Overlapping automation and colliding jobs
  • Redundant permission sets and forked components
  • Legacy Workflow and Process Builder

Org Audit

Acme Production · last run 6 minutes ago

Grade C

Automation & Flows

64

Permissions & Security

71

Apex & Code

78

Fields & Data Quality

82

Limits & Performance

91

Change Intelligence

69

Process Intelligence

74

Compliance

80

Packages & Apps

88

Adoption

76

AI Readiness

72

Metadata Graph

85

03rank

How is Salesforce technical debt prioritised?

The Technical debt lens ranks duplicates, unused metadata and legacy automation for each org. Audit findings carry a severity and an effort band, minutes, hours or days, from what the fix involves, priced at a stated rate so cleanup can compete with feature work on equal terms.

The assessment also models the annual carrying cost and three year exposure of leaving a finding alone, which is the business case for doing the work. Severity and effort are shown side by side, so quick, serious items rise to the top.

  • Ranked per org
  • Effort priced in dollars
  • Carrying cost for the business case

Org Audit

Acme Production · last run 6 minutes ago

Grade C

Priced at $150 an hour, shown on screen

  • Admin user inactive for 90+ days

    critical Minutes

    $75

  • Flow has no fault path

    high Hours

    $600

  • SOQL query inside a loop

    high Hours

    $600

  • Production change made outside the pipeline

    high Hours

    $600

  • Three record-triggered Flows on Case

    medium Days

    $2,400

5 selectedCreate statement of work

04unused

How do you know metadata is really unused?

Only when the evidence is complete. SyncOnAI 360 never concludes a field, class or Flow is unused from a missing reference alone; if the source needed to prove it could not be read, the result is unknown, with the reason.

That makes the cleanup list one you can act on. Before removing anything, impact analysis shows who writes to a field and what uses it, and the change goes through a proposal with its blast radius.

  • Unused only with complete evidence
  • Unknown, with a reason, otherwise
  • Impact checked before removal

Lineage: Case.Priority

Acme Production · what uses it, what it uses

Changing the values of Case.Priority affects 6 components. Two Flows branch on the value "High" and would stop routing escalations.

  • 2 Flowsread Case.Priority and branch on it
  • 1 Apex classsets it on insert
  • 1 validation rulerequires it on escalation
  • 1 reportgroups by it
  • 1 Lightning pageshows it on the console

05fix

How do you remove Salesforce technical debt safely?

Turn findings into work items on a project board in one step, or into a priced statement of work. In the Flow builder, one fix, such as removing a hardcoded id, can be applied to every affected Flow at once and reviewed as one set, and fault handling can be added across a Flow in one edit.

Every change is a proposal with checks and blast radius, approved by a second admin for production, with a receipt and rollback. When the audit runs again, fixed findings are marked verified fixed.

  • Findings to work items or a SOW
  • One fix across many Flows
  • Governed removal with rollback
  • Verified by re-audit

Flow: Case_Intake_Route

Record-triggered · after save

Add fault handling to the 2 elements that can fail, routed to one error screen.

StartCase created
Get RecordsGet Queue by region
DecisionRegion?
Update RecordsAssign to queue

06How it works

A technical debt cleanup

From suspicion to verified removal.

  1. 01

    Find

    Detectors and the audit list duplication, overlap, unused and legacy items.

  2. 02

    Price

    Each finding gets an effort band and a cost.

  3. 03

    Prove

    Check impact and evidence before removing anything.

  4. 04

    Plan

    Put the work on a board or into a SOW.

  5. 05

    Remove

    Ship through proposals and confirm with a re-audit.

07Before and after

Technical debt, with and without SyncOnAI 360

Without

With SyncOnAI 360

A half-finished spreadsheet

Debt detected and ranked from evidence

No cost, so no priority

Every finding priced at a stated rate

Afraid to delete anything

Unused only when the evidence is complete

The same fix, Flow by Flow

One fix across every affected Flow

No proof the cleanup worked

Re-audits mark each fix verified

08Who uses it

Who uses technical debt analysis

Salesforce adminsGet a ranked list of duplicate rules, overlapping automation and legacy Workflow and Process Builder for each org, with the evidence behind each item, and remove what is safe with impact checked first.Salesforce architectsSee where the org has drifted: several Flows on one trigger, overlapping automation, forked components and redundant permission sets, each explained, so a consolidation plan rests on evidence.ConsultanciesTurn a debt assessment into a priced statement of work in one step, and show the client verified fixes after the re-audit, which makes cleanup an engagement rather than unbilled goodwill.Platform ownersWeigh cleanup against feature work on equal terms: every finding carries an effort band, a cost and the yearly carrying cost of leaving it, the business case a budget conversation needs.

09Questions

Frequently asked questions

Configuration and code that make the org harder to change: duplicated rules, overlapping automation, unused fields, legacy Workflow and Process Builder, and code that ignores best practice.

Yes, when the evidence supports it. A field is only called unused when the source needed to prove it was read; otherwise the result is unknown, with the reason.

Yes. The audit flags active Process Builder and Workflow Rules, and large numbers of inactive Flows.

By severity and by effort, priced at a stated rate, with the annual carrying cost of leaving it as the business case.

It drafts fixes as proposals, including one fix applied across many Flows. Every change is reviewed and approved before it deploys.

It compares text and structure and explains what looks alike. Whether to merge is a business decision left with you.

Yes. Findings become a priced statement of work in one step.

Yes. Every plan includes every feature.

10Keep exploring

Related

Org Audit55 checks, priced findings, a letter gradeLineage and ImpactWhat breaks before you change itDependency GraphEvery relationship, traced to evidenceFlow BuilderFlows from a sentence or the canvasOrg IntelligenceUnderstand every org down to its sourcePricingEvery feature on every plan

Start in 5 minutes. No card required.

Connect your Salesforce org. Run your first health scan. Ask your first question. See what you've been missing.

Start free, connect my orgBook a demo with SyncOnAI
  • Anthropic
  • OpenAI