Use case: technical debt
Turn a vague sense that the org is a mess into a ranked, priced list, and remove each item with proof that it is safe.
In one paragraph
Reducing Salesforce technical debt with SyncOnAI 360 means finding duplicates, overlapping automation, unused metadata and legacy automation from evidence, ranking each item by severity and priced effort, planning the work on a board or in a statement of work, and removing it through proposals that a re-audit verifies.
01The problem
Debt is easy to feel and hard to list. Without an inventory, a price and proof of safety, cleanup loses to new features every time.
Nobody can say exactly where the debt is.
Cleanup cannot compete with features without a cost.
Fear of breaking something stops every deletion.
Nobody checks whether cleanup actually happened.
02find
Detectors find duplicate validation rules, similar fields, overlapping automation, redundant permission sets, forked components and colliding scheduled jobs. The audit adds legacy Workflow and Process Builder, inactive Flows, undocumented fields and objects, field sprawl and ancient Apex API versions.
03price
Each finding has a severity and an effort band, minutes, hours or days, priced at a stated rate you can change. The assessment models the yearly carrying cost and three-year exposure of leaving it, the business case for the budget conversation.
04prove
Nothing is called unused without complete evidence; otherwise the result is unknown, with the reason. Impact analysis lists what references an item before it is touched, and live queries show whether records still use it.
05plan
Turn findings into work items on a project board in one step, or into a priced statement of work for a client. Each carries its evidence and estimate, so the plan rests on facts.
06remove
Ship each removal as a proposal with checks, blast radius and validation, approved for production by a second admin. One fix can be applied across every affected Flow. Run the audit again: each fixed finding is marked verified fixed, or regressed if it returns.
07cadence
The org refreshes every six hours and the audit can run whenever you need it, so debt can be reviewed on the same cadence as releases rather than once a year. Review history keeps every past review for comparison.
A short review before each release, of new findings and regressions, stops debt accumulating again after a cleanup.
08How it works
From suspicion to verified removal.
Run detectors and the audit.
Read effort, cost and carrying cost.
Check references and data before removal.
Put the work on a board or into a SOW.
Ship through proposals and re-audit.
09Checklist
10Before and after
Without
With SyncOnAI 360
A feeling the org is messy
A ranked, evidenced inventory
No cost, no priority
Every item priced
Afraid to delete
Proof before removal
No follow-up
Re-audits verify each fix
12Questions
Duplicated rules and fields, overlapping automation, unused metadata, legacy Workflow and Process Builder, and code that ignores best practice.
By severity and priced effort, with the carrying cost as the business case.
No. Every removal is a proposal you approve.
Re-audits mark each fixed finding verified fixed, or regressed if it returns.
Yes. Findings become a priced statement of work in one step.
It compares text and structure and explains what looks alike; merging is your decision.
Yes. The rate is stated and can be changed.
Yes. Every plan includes every feature.
Yes. The audit flags Apex on ancient API versions.
Yes. Review history keeps every past review so scores and findings can be compared.
Yes. Pick the findings for the object that hurts most, clean it up, and show the result before widening the scope.
13Keep exploring
Connect your Salesforce org. Run your first health scan. Ask your first question. See what you've been missing.